lupagreenwolf: (Default)
[personal profile] lupagreenwolf
Originally posted by [personal profile] write_light at BAD Internet Laws Heading Your Way

From the flist: 



Spread the word, even you're not a US citizen, it is important for everyone!! It easy to do and it can change everything. More info by clicking on the banner.

Website Blocking

The government can order service providers to block websites for infringing links posted by any users.

Risk of Jail for Ordinary Users

It becomes a felony with a potential 5 year sentence to stream a copyrighted work that would cost more than $2,500 to license, even if you are a totally noncommercial user, e.g. singing a pop song on Facebook.

Chaos for the Internet

Thousands of sites that are legal under the DMCA would face new legal threats. People trying to keep the internet more secure wouldn't be able to rely on the integrity of the DNS system.


Read this analysis from boing-boing.net

Get on the phone and call your representative. Express your disapproval. Tell him or her exactly how you feel, and that you don't support this. Tell your friends to call their representatives, their Congressperson, and complain. Mention that you are a registered voter that takes your civic responsibility seriously and that you will use that vote to express your feelings about this.

http://www.rollcall.com/issues/57_60/Internet-Companies-Boost-Hill-Lobbying-210345-1.html?pos=olobh

“We support the bill’s stated goals — providing additional enforcement tools to combat foreign ‘rogue’ websites that are dedicated to copyright infringement or counterfeiting,” the Internet companies wrote in Tuesday’s letter. “Unfortunately, the bills as drafted would expose law-abiding U.S. Internet and technology companies to new uncertain liabilities, private rights of action and technology mandates that would require monitoring of websites.”  The chamber-led coalition in support of the bill includes Walmart, Eli Lilly & Co. and Netflix.

Google and other opponents of the legislation argue that restricting the Internet in the U.S. sets a bad international precedent and that the language defines infringing too broadly.

on 2011-11-18 06:42 am (UTC)
laughinglotus: black scorpion (Default)
Posted by [personal profile] laughinglotus
pft This is awful, just aweful. I'll have to repost this tomorrow.

on 2011-11-18 03:05 pm (UTC)
baphnedia: (Default)
Posted by [personal profile] baphnedia
Yeah - passage of a bill like this would be cause for me to possibly shut my company down. Not because we rely on orders via the Internet, but because most of our resources and the method we use to reach people is doing so on-line first.

The other thing is the price requirement for licensing fees... the $2,500. After this bill is passed, it will cost $2,500 or more to license anything.

I do applaud Hollywood for trying to take control back of their intellectual property. Because the bill is too... generalized... I see the potential for abuse about as high as giving Kim Jong Il of North Korea our entire remaining stock of nuclear weapons.

The Internet will move elsewhere, and the United States will have (another) chapter in it's long Greater Depression.

on 2011-11-18 09:37 pm (UTC)
laughinglotus: black scorpion (Default)
Posted by [personal profile] laughinglotus
"The other thing is the price requirement for licensing fees... the $2,500. After this bill is passed, it will cost $2,500 or more to license anything."

This is an example how many huge companies lobby for regulations- not because they care about workers or consumers but because said regulations make it harder for start ups to compete. Hence such regulations squash competition.

Profile

lupagreenwolf: (Default)
Lupa Greenwolf

October 2016

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23 242526272829
3031     

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 3rd, 2026 08:23 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios